| Author: Alexander Hamilton 
 To the People of the State of New York:
 
 As CONNECTED with the subject of revenue, we may with propriety 
				consider that of economy. The money saved from one object may be 
				usefully applied to another, and there will be so much the less 
				to be drawn from the pockets of the people. If the States are 
				united under one government, there will be but one national 
				civil list to support; if they are divided into several 
				confederacies, there will be as many different national civil 
				lists to be provided for--and each of them, as to the principal 
				departments, coextensive with that which would be necessary for 
				a government of the whole. The entire separation of the States 
				into thirteen unconnected sovereignties is a project too 
				extravagant and too replete with danger to have many advocates. 
				The ideas of men who speculate upon the dismemberment of the 
				empire seem generally turned toward three confederacies--one 
				consisting of the four Northern, another of the four Middle, and 
				a third of the five Southern States. There is little probability 
				that there would be a greater number. According to this 
				distribution, each confederacy would comprise an extent of 
				territory larger than that of the kingdom of Great Britain. No 
				well-informed man will suppose that the affairs of such a 
				confederacy can be properly regulated by a government less 
				comprehensive in its organs or institutions than that which has 
				been proposed by the convention. When the dimensions of a State 
				attain to a certain magnitude, it requires the same energy of 
				government and the same forms of administration which are 
				requisite in one of much greater extent. This idea admits not of 
				precise demonstration, because there is no rule by which we can 
				measure the momentum of civil power necessary to the government 
				of any given number of individuals; but when we consider that 
				the island of Britain, nearly commensurate with each of the 
				supposed confederacies, contains about eight millions of people, 
				and when we reflect upon the degree of authority required to 
				direct the passions of so large a society to the public good, we 
				shall see no reason to doubt that the like portion of power 
				would be sufficient to perform the same task in a society far 
				more numerous. Civil power, properly organized and exerted, is 
				capable of diffusing its force to a very great extent; and can, 
				in a manner, reproduce itself in every part of a great empire by 
				a judicious arrangement of subordinate institutions.
 
 The supposition that each confederacy into which the States 
				would be likely to be divided would require a government not 
				less comprehensive than the one proposed, will be strengthened 
				by another supposition, more probable than that which presents 
				us with three confederacies as the alternative to a general 
				Union. If we attend carefully to geographical and commercial 
				considerations, in conjunction with the habits and prejudices of 
				the different States, we shall be led to conclude that in case 
				of disunion they will most naturally league themselves under two 
				governments. The four Eastern States, from all the causes that 
				form the links of national sympathy and connection, may with 
				certainty be expected to unite. New York, situated as she is, 
				would never be unwise enough to oppose a feeble and unsupported 
				flank to the weight of that confederacy. There are other obvious 
				reasons that would facilitate her accession to it. New Jersey is 
				too small a State to think of being a frontier, in opposition to 
				this still more powerful combination; nor do there appear to be 
				any obstacles to her admission into it. Even Pennsylvania would 
				have strong inducements to join the Northern league. An active 
				foreign commerce, on the basis of her own navigation, is her 
				true policy, and coincides with the opinions and dispositions of 
				her citizens. The more Southern States, from various 
				circumstances, may not think themselves much interested in the 
				encouragement of navigation. They may prefer a system which 
				would give unlimited scope to all nations to be the carriers as 
				well as the purchasers of their commodities. Pennsylvania may 
				not choose to confound her interests in a connection so adverse 
				to her policy. As she must at all events be a frontier, she may 
				deem it most consistent with her safety to have her exposed side 
				turned towards the weaker power of the Southern, rather than 
				towards the stronger power of the Northern, Confederacy. This 
				would give her the fairest chance to avoid being the Flanders of 
				America. Whatever may be the determination of Pennsylvania, if 
				the Northern Confederacy includes New Jersey, there is no 
				likelihood of more than one confederacy to the south of that 
				State.
 
 Nothing can be more evident than that the thirteen States will 
				be able to support a national government better than one half, 
				or one third, or any number less than the whole. This reflection 
				must have great weight in obviating that objection to the 
				proposed plan, which is founded on the principle of expense; an 
				objection, however, which, when we come to take a nearer view of 
				it, will appear in every light to stand on mistaken ground.
 
 If, in addition to the consideration of a plurality of civil 
				lists, we take into view the number of persons who must 
				necessarily be employed to guard the inland communication 
				between the different confederacies against illicit trade, and 
				who in time will infallibly spring up out of the necessities of 
				revenue; and if we also take into view the military 
				establishments which it has been shown would unavoidably result 
				from the jealousies and conflicts of the several nations into 
				which the States would be divided, we shall clearly discover 
				that a separation would be not less injurious to the economy, 
				than to the tranquillity, commerce, revenue, and liberty of 
				every part.
 
 PUBLIUS.
 |